
FRAMEWORK 01
-
IN DEVELOPMENT
ATHLETIC SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
ENDSLEY'S SA MODEL → ENDURANCE SPORT
A direct translation of Endsley's three-level situational awareness model - one of aviation's most robust cognitive frameworks - into endurance sport performance. The first structured attempt to apply human factors SA theory to race execution and in-race decision-making.
Introduces the PACED process as the practical application layer: a five-step cognitive protocol designed to preserve situational awareness under physical load and counteract the decision failures that fatigue produces. Applicable from a 5km parkrun to a full Ironman.
THE PROBLEM
In endurance sport, the conventional wisdom is that performance breakdowns happen physiologically - you ran out of glycogen, you bonked, you cramped. But the evidence from human factors research tells a different story. Most late-race collapses are preceded by a series of poor decisions: a pace that was unsustainable but felt manageable, a hydration deficit that accumulated unnoticed, an effort level applied without reference to what remained
The athlete didn't lack fitness. They lost situational awareness. They failed to perceive the right signals, failed to correctly interpret what those signals meant, and failed to project where the current trajectory would end. Aviation identified and named these failure modes 40 years ago. Endurance coaching has yet to build a coherent language for them. ASA is an attempt to change that.
WHY THIS HAPPENS
THREE FAILURE MODES.
ONE ROOT CAUSE.
The SA literature identifies a consistent taxonomy of failure. All three appear in endurance sport with remarkable regularity.
FAILURE MODE 01
THE AWARENESS COLLAPSE
Under significant physical load, the executive functions responsible for self-monitoring, forward planning, and error correction degrade before the athlete is consciously aware of it. You lose the ability to accurately assess yourself at the precise moment accurate self-assessment matters most. The process is gradual, insidious, and almost always invisible to the person it's happening to.
FAILIURE MODE 02
FIXED MENTAL MODELS
Athletes apply static interpretations to dynamic conditions. A heart rate of 165 bpm means something completely different at kilometre 5 than at kilometre 35 of a marathon, in different weather, on different terrain, after different sleep. Without active contextualisation, the athlete reads a number and applies last week's meaning to this week's race. This is the comprehension failure - Level 2 in the Endsley model.
FAILURE MODE 03
LOST PROJECTION
The capacity to ask "if I maintain this effort, what happens in 20 minutes?" collapses earliest under fatigue. Research on dual-task performance under physical load consistently shows that prospective reasoning is the first executive function to degrade - yet it's the one athletes rely on most heavily in the back half of any long-course event. They cannot accurately model their future state at the moment it matters most.
FRAMEWORKS
MODELS & APPLIED FRAMEWORKS
Each framework translates an established body of human factors research into a practical tool for endurance sport. Published as standalone pages with a free downloadable literature review.
ASA
FRAMEWORK 01
ATHLETIC SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
RACE EXECUTION
DECISION MAKING
COGNITIVE FATIGUE
EXPLORE FRAMEWORK →
-
PLANNED
EF
FRAMEWORK 02
FATIGUE & EXECUTIVE FUNCTION
Dual-Task Literature → Race Decisions
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION
DUAL TASK
FATIGUE
COMING SOON
-
PLANNED
CRM
FRAMEWORK 03
CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN COACHING
CRM Principles → Coach–Athlete Communication
COMMUNICATION
COACHING
CRM
COMING SOON
-
PLANNED